Recent Blog Posts



All Recent Posts

Can of Bliss 2010 continues

In the 1930’s, after parts of former Mexico like Arizona and California and New Mexico had been annexed by the US, many Mexicans found themselves living in the newly created American West, the same land Mexicans had lived for generations, but now under new ownership – the result of new borders and quasi-military invasions. Many of these ‘locals’ grew and smoked marijuana for medicinal as well as for recreational purposes. 

 

EVERY society since the dawn of man has enjoyed mind altering substances like alcohol and other naturally occurring intoxicants. The first beers in Egypt and Ancient China were gruel like meal made from fermented grains.   Small children spin until they get dizzy and fall down, only to get up and do it again. Peyote Mushrooms, Morning Glory seeds, Jimson weed – many existing plants with hallucinogenic properties have played integral roles in the lives of many cultures of people for millennia. Even jailed prisoners make hallucinogens from moldy rye bread. It is human nature to enjoy a ‘buzz’ when the occasion arises. Getting high has been a universal hobby for every human civilization since the dawn of mankind. Coffee breaks are required by law in some US states still in 2010.

 

Because as America entered the 20th century, Mexicans were smoking cannabis, and because Mexicans now lived in the USA and couldn’t rightly be ‘removed’ from their land – Extermination, while it worked with the Native Americans and was the preferred form of ‘settlement’ by most European Imperialists during the 16th and 17th Century invastion of the ‘West Indies’, presently known as the Americas; and the 19th Century ‘Scramble for Africa’, as it has been termed, extermination had started to receive a lot of negative press in the newly created Global Press by the 20th century. Plus, there had already been much displacement as the incoming Americans took the better land. Extermination became a less common practice by colonial Americans achieving their manifest destiny. They opted to live side-by-side with Mexicans, since extermination was now considered not en vogue

 

White Americans needed an edge. Anti-cannabis legislation was one tool used to marginalize Mexicans and African- Americans living the US. Jazz Musicians like Louis Armstrong, Kid Ory and others, who were mostly African American and/or Creole – the 18th and 19th century French colonies, specifically New Orleans in Louisiana, named for the King of France, was the epicenter of a musical revolution. These mixed race Black French Americans created Jazz music. They were also targeted by anti-cannabis legislation. All the brass instruments: sax, trumpet, trombone, tuba, etc. are French, which partially explains why Jazz music has always been popular in France. Still, the darker elements of that culture found themselves persecuted.

 

That must have been a crazy time: the Deep South, plantations, French people; some Blacks free, some Blacks slaves; some Blacks famous musicians! Ann Rice, of vampire novel fame, wrote a really cool historical novel about New Orleans Creole culture at the end of the 19th century called Feast of All Saints, a stellar novel that puts the reader there at that time. Sure, all the stories, all the people are probably made up, but you feel like you are there; and it’s a strange time – early America. Gore Vidal also writes brilliant historical novels about Colonial era USA – Burr and Lincoln and 1876. Even if the stories may be ‘historically inaccurate’, I don’t think that is the point. 

 

Just like Culturebook – we are not writing history. History is a point of view. What Rice and Vidal give to their readers is a slice of life – at that time. What was it like when Alexander Hamilton got shot by Aaron Burr on grassy knoll in a duel, and due to the law of the land, that pre-meditated murder was not a crime?  A small audience even attended the sporty execution!  Bets were made on the outcome. Hamilton ended up on the 10 dollar bill. Aaron Burr never went on to higher office. Who’s Aaron Burr? He’s the man who shot Alexander Hamilton. That’s all he is remembered for; but in his time, he was a brilliant statesman.

 

Because, for the most part, only these groups – Blacks, Creoles, and Mexicans – openly smoked cannabis, it was easy for White Americans to get behind the new legislation. The government, police, school principals and business owners, local leaders: all were White men! Marijuana legislation was largely an effort to incarcerate and marginalize African Americans and Mexicans.

 

It’s difficult to get a good job with a criminal record, or documented proof that you are a ‘drug addict’. Movies like Refer Madness in the 1930’s sought to show white Americans, who were ignorant of cannabis’ history, that marijuana caused Black people to rape white women and Mexicans to act crazy. The film, Reefer Madness opens with minutes of scroll propaganda – Marihuana is a scourge on the youth…the most vile evil on the planet. Etc. Then the movie begins with an educated looking man, a well-known 1930’s actor, speaking for several minutes at a podium about this ‘atrocity’. He basically gives a 5 minute lecture restating what the scroll said; then, the dramatic rendition. Racist White Americans accepted this misinformation as truth.

 

William Randolph Hearst was instrumental in promoting this new legislation. Hearst owned many newspapers and magazines and by calling the plant marihuana for the first time, the name later became marijuana; in effect, this renaming separated this ‘new drug menace’ from its well known nomenclature – hemp or cannabis, an agricultural staple known the world over for millennia. This renaming was similar to the tactics used by the Thought Police in Orwell’s 1984And the word became flesh John 1:14   Carnitas the other white meat. The words, canvas and cannabis and are related entomologically. The Mona Lisa was painted on a cannabis canvas

 

What had been known and used the world over since the time of Jesus times three, had become suddenly some Mexican menace in America in the minds of late 1930’s White Americans, shortly after the repeal of alcohol’s prohibition, which lasted from 1920 till 1933. In 1933, liquor became legalized. In 1937, Marijuana became illegal. That 13 year ban on alcohol makes the Roaring 20s either dry; or severly hypocritical.

 

In the history of the United States, Prohibition, also known as The Noble Experiment, was the period from 1920 to 1933, during which time: the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol for consumption were banned nationally, as mandated in the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution.

 

The Repeal of alcohol’s ban took place after people called for the change in law. The 21st amendment, which basically undid the 18th amendment, is unlike any other amendment to the constitution because the 21st amendment...

 

is the only amendment to have been ratified by state ratifying conventions, specially selected for one purpose [to repeal an existing law], whereas all other amendments have been ratified by state legislatures. The 21st is also the only amendment that was passed for the explicit purpose of repealing an amendment to the Constitution.  -- from Wikipedia

 

Four years after liquor’s ban was repealed, anti-hemp legislation went into effect. It was as if Organized Crime, which included crooked officials, police, and mobsters, suddenly needed another “safe/social drug” to control and profit from once liquor was off the criminal market.  That safe/social drug was hemp: IT IS ONLY FOR PROFIT AND GREED AND ORGANIZED CRIME AND RACIST PURPOSES THAT CANNABIS HAS EVER BEEN ILLEGAL IN THE US. 

 

People still refuse to see the truth, even in 2010 MMX, with all this information. Racist white Americans were quick to accept these new laws back in the 1930s and 1940’s, since they sought to protect their daughters from Blacks and Mexicans; but sub-consciously, they also sought to protect the better jobs available for themselves.

 

During the depressions of 1890, 1910, and of course the Great One, the first one where poor Americans got any government relief, begining 1929, many Whites didn’t want to work for low wages, so recently freed ‘slaves’ and Mexicans began taking those jobs, a trend that STILL continues and causes anti-Mexican legislation. Yes, I’m talking about Arizona 2010. 

 

Believing in racial superiority is a survival mechanism. Racist White Americans can not really be blamed for believing the hype because humans will believe anything if they are told something at birth and made to believe it their entire lives.

 

William R. Hearst had an agenda for launching this ‘anti-hemp’ campaign. Hearst was a major stockholder in the DuPont Corporation, which had just produced nylon – a completely synthetic fiber whose production pollutes the environment, but whose uses could replace those of hemp, and whose mass production could make the executives of DuPont extremely rich, if they could monopolize the production of such everyday items. 

 

In twenty years, most rope, tents, parachutes and other materials would be made from nylon; thus, replacing hemp entirely, making Dupont one of the biggest companies in the world. All hemp cultivation in the US ceased and factories polluting our environment were erected on those fields, metaphorically. For the next thirty years, cannabis use in the US virtually disappeared, or went underground into the ‘criminal world’, while factories that polluted the environment were erected globally. White stockholders in DuPont also got rich from this US government anti-hemp policy, and the environment has suffered ever since.

 

The 1960’s saw a resurgence of marijuana use with hippies. Most of the marijuana smoked in America came from Mexico, or from Columbia via Mexico. Lumbo it was called. In the early 1970’s, the US government in an effort to control the import of cannabis began spraying the poisonous chemical ‘paraquat’ over pot fields in Mexico, poisoning the land as well as the crop. The pot crop, which still came to America, and was subsequently smoked by Americas who were later hospitalized, never lessened in popularity.

 

The RESULT of this attack on cannabis crops in Mexico – marijuana cultivation moved to the States, namely Northern California and Hawaii, the regions whose climate were best suited to the tropical plant – those areas are moist and never get any snow! 

 

When Reagan started his war on drugs in the 1980’s and began burning and destroying crops in the Northern California Triangle of Trinity, Mendocino and Humboldt counties, and imprisoning small business men and farmers in Northern California with no prior criminal records, the cultivation of cannabis did not end – it moved indoors. The Triangle still has the highest concentration of cash crops in the entire country.

 

The result is modern medical marijuana. Grown indoors, in grow rooms across the country, but especially in the Triangle, or nearby Santa Cruz or Eureka, at optimal conditions designed by the most educated and talented botanists of the present day – a typical marijuana plant can go from seed to mature buds inches in length and grams in mass with maximum potency, the likes of which has never been seen in human history, in just three months. From clone to mature bud in just two months! 

 

All lighting, moisture, temperature, every possible condition is controlled by man and machine. Seasons mean nothing – a grow room can easily have up to 5 harvests a year. Nature has nothing to do with the modern cultivation of cannabis anymore. Products like lights and nutrients and watering apparatuses and timers specific to the purposes of lighting and watering marijuana plants outsell all other nursery items each year. The amount of sophistication and technology that goes into the cultivation of marijuana each year begs the question:

To be Continued

Vote YES on Prop 19 Legalize it!

Election Day being Monday, and today being the 4 year anniversary of my fathers' leaving this earth, I'll be presenting my essay, Can of Bliss from Culturebook Book Two in 3 parts.  Part one.

Can of Bliss 2010


Here is an analogy to expand your mind – Apartheid, South Africa; Slave Nation USA 1810; Nazi Germany: three demerits on Human History. What did these three localities have in common? Black people and Jews, respectively, were believed to be less than human. It was not socially acceptable for a White man or a German man to publicly date a Black woman or a Jewish woman. Raping them was not illegal; but public love was forbidden. Even impregnating / deserting these allegedly racially inferior women was not considered inappropriate behavior, if those indiscretions were kept out of the family spotlight. 

 

In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, the character Mr. Dolphus Randolf drank out of a brown paper bag in public, didn’t shave, and dressed disheveled; so to let people think that he was a drunk. Why? Because Mr. Randolf was married to a Black woman in the South; and in the minds of his Southern neighbors, it was tolerable that he was married to a Black woman because of his alcoholism. Mr. Randolf didn’t drink. 

 

When 9 year old Scout Finch first drinks from Mr. Randolf’s bottle outside the courthouse, inside which her lawyer father Atticus Finch was defending a black man falsely accused of raping a white woman – Scout realized that the bagged, bottled beverage was Coca-Cola. Scout also realized her town’s hypocrisy. That small town was America. Tom Robinson, the black man accused of raping the white woman, defended by Atticus Finch; even though it was so obvious that he was innocent, Tom Robinson was convicted guilty, and later shot.

 

It’s not coca-cola. It’s rice!  Joe Strummer

 

The question is: if a white man in early 19th century America wanted to marry an African American woman; or if a German man in Nazi Germany fell in love with a Jewish woman, would it have been morally WRONG for these love torn men to pursue their love’s true interest? Sure, now with our 20/20 hindsight, it is easy to judge, but what about then? Should these lovers of ethnically different partners have renounced their affection, believed that the person they loved was of an inferior race, just because that’s what the culture deemed appropriate?  Because that is what the law of the land proclaimed? Because that’s what their moms and dads wanted? 

 

Whose law should these dissenters have followed?  In the case of marijuana, more commonly known in past times as HEMP or CANNABIS or REEFER, it is a crime to grow this plant, or to smoke this plant in 37 of the 50 American states. 13 American states allow smoking and growing, by prescription only.

Archeological evidence shows that humans have been cultivating and smoking cannabis for nearly 6000 years. What started out as just a weed, like millions of other species of green leafy plants inhabiting this earth: some flavorful and edible, some beautiful, some toxic, some that’ll give you a rash if you touch a leaf; some that have populated the planet since the time of dinosaurs. Green leafy plants that we pass on our way daily: while many other species of weed have gone extinct, cannabis has spread all over the globe. While cannabis still grows wild in some parts of the world, most of cannabis’s present cultivation is, and has been for millennia, an agricultural staple, a product of husbandry and devotion by humans for human consumption. Hashish, named from the Arabic word حشي meaning dry grass, was first developed by nomadic traders for easy transport and longevity; back when the Tigris and Euphrates river valleys were still fertile, while humanity was in its infancy. 

 

The uses of cannabis, for the last six thousand years have included the following – the raw material of paper, rope, clothing, any textile product that cotton or nylon can be made into in the modern day; it’s resin has been used as glue and as a lubricant for machine parts; it’s intoxicating effects have been used as medicine to treat women’s monthly discomfort, as well as, a general analgesic for all people. Women in ancient India didn’t have Motrin. 

 

The scientific literature now brims with potential uses for cannabis that extend beyond its well-known abilities to fend off nausea and block pain in people with cancer and AIDS. Cannabis derivatives may combat multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease and other inflammatory conditions, the new research finds. Cannabis may even kill cancerous tumors. -- Quoted directly from Science News Vol 177 6/19/10 Not Just a High by Nathan Seppa    

My mother subscribes to Science News.
  I read the article over coffee, one June morning, before driving my mother to work. Information about the myriad of medical uses of cannabis is readily available. People just refuse to accept the use of cannabis in modern America on ideological grounds.

 

US President Obama in 2010 began his plea for health care reform, “I am not an Ideologue!”  Finally! Let’s look beyond labels and religion and beliefs and taboo and stigmas and look at FACTS! In early America, by the 1920’s, at virtually every pharmacy in every city in America, cannabis in tincture form could be purchased legally without prescription as an analgesic.

Many older Americans knew well what cannabis was. Early colonial charters mandated that a certain percentage of farm land MUST be allocated for hemp cultivation, since its uses were so plentiful. Jefferson, and all his half-African American children – Jefferson had many 50/50 children and sister-girlfriends, like Sally Hemmings, who would’ve been his wife, had other White Americans been more tolerant of mixed marriages.  All the founding father of Virginia had hemp farms. George Washington, not to be confused with George Jefferson, even had an underground level under his main dining area; so during meal banquets, black slaves could do all the food preparation and serving, but never appear in person – dumbwaiters did all the presentation of comida. “Oh look, here’s the ham!” Who cooked or served the succulent pork dish or washed the dishes never became a concern for rich Americans who could afford ‘foreign help’. Things have not changed much since 1787. 

When and why did anti-cannabis legislation begin?


To be Continued

CNNGo - Suwon's Hwaseong Fortress

Truth be told, I've been sitting on a little news for a few weeks. A while back I decided to try my hand at producing a QiRanger Adventure for a slightly different market. I opted to submit a piece to CNNGo, the Asian travel arm of CNN International.

To my delight, they accepted my pitch and I set off filming one of my favorite places. Not only did I need to write a short article, I needed to capture the beauty of  Suwon Fortress and do it proud (most notably, since my last video of this place was an 11 minute ramble as I walked through its grounds).

I shot video over four days. Yes, four days. I had to make sure my costuming was set in a way that I could easily keep it consistent throughout the process.

I also enlisted some help on the project. Jo came out with me three times and operated the camera while I was out doing narrations. I also asked my friend Daichen to write the music for the main portion. He came through and I'm really pleased with the tune.

While editing the video, I had to cut so much out. To think I was worried that I wouldn't have enough to fill the running time and I wound up with just the opposite... five minutes wasn't enough to include  all the great video I captured, but certainly enough to focus on what story I wanted to tell.

I would be honored if you'd surf over to CNNGo and check out the video here!

Thanks and I look forward to reading your comments on what you think of this first endeavor with CNNGo.

How the notes all bend and reach above the trees

Sorry, sorry, sorry.
Between crossing a few times zones,
cancelled flights,
jet lag,
and working on finding a new job and apartment,
 I'm a little scattered. 


Hawaiian photos are coming.
I promise.
Soon.
Sort of.
xo

Resisting the Criminalization of Abortion in South Korea

( Source )

Like Lindsay Lohan says, some stories do indeed keep on growing. And the more I’ve learned about abortion in recent weeks, the more certain I am that if it doesn’t become a hot political issue for Lee Myung-bak in the remaining years of his presidency, then it certainly will be if not addressed by his successor.

Not so much because Koreans feel strongly about the issue itself however. Rather, because this is the same president that despite campaign promises not to, immediately tried to abolish the (then) Ministry of Gender Equality for instance. And also, because a year later, he encouraged targeting women for mass layoffs as a solution to the financial crisis.

Criminalizing abortion simply in order to increase the birthrate rate then, is really part and parcel of a wider mentality that is fundamentally failing to get to grips with women’s entrenched inequality here. And perhaps could come be the symbol and/or catalyst for later volatile protests about any number of related issues, much like those in 2008 were never really simply about imported beef.

Until then, following on from this earlier post about a video that alerted me to the fact that doctors were getting (suspended) sentences for performing abortions, I’ve translated the following article to give you more information about those. And in the process, I’ve confirmed commenter Matt of Gusts of Popular Feeling’s point about it that no doctor mentioned actually had to spend any time in jail.

However, as you’ll see, the article does not appear to say that the manager of the gynecology clinic in Suwon also got a suspended sentence, which would presumably mean that in fact he or she at least did go to jail. Which seems just a little unfair and confusing, so if anyone with better Korean skills can please clarify, then that would be much appreciated!^^ (source, right)

잇따른낙태죄실형선고 부당해

“Continued Sentences for ‘Abortion Crimes’ are Unjust”

<임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크>규탄성명 발표 / A Public Denouncement by The Network for Pregnancy & Birth Decision Rights (NPBDR)

최근 들어 인공임신중절을 시술한 의사에게 실형이 선고되는 사례가 잇따르자 이에 대한 비판의 목소리가 커지고 있다. 이례적인 처벌 강화가 인공임신중절 시술의 위축을 가져와 여성들의 안전과 건강을 위협할 것이라는 우려에서다.

Recently, criticism has been growing of the numbers of doctors receiving sentences for performing abortions. There is a great deal of worry and anxiety that singling out abortion laws for enforcement will reduce the number of abortions and be dangerous for women’s safety and health.

‘임신중절’ 시술 의사에게 실형판결 잇따라 / Doctors are continually being sentenced for performing abortions

지난 9월 3일 울산지방법원은 인공임신중절을 시술한 의사에게 1심에서 징역 6월에 집행유예 1년, 자격정지 1년을 선고했다. 이에 앞서 지난 8월 수원지방법원은 역시 인공임신중절 시술 혐의로 고발된 산부인과 의사와 사무장에게 각각 징역 1년에 집행유예 2년, 징역 2년 6월의 실형을 선고했다.

On the 3rd of September, in the first session of a case at Ulsan District Court, a doctor who performed an abortion was given a 6-month jail sentence suspended for 1 year (i.e. no jail), and was stripped of their doctor’s license for 1 year. And in August at Suwon District Court, a gynecologist who was suspected of performing an abortion and the gynecology clinic manager were given a 1 year sentence suspended for 2 years and a 2 year, 6 month jail sentence respectively.

이는 그동안 인공임신중절에 대한 기소 건수 자체가 적었고, 기소되더라도 선고유예에 그치는 경우가 대부분이었던 것과 비교해 이례적이라는 평가다. (source, right)

Even though the number of cases of doctors that have received sentences for performing abortions is small, and most have received suspended sentences, compared with those the above cases are quite exceptional.

올해 2월 프로라이프의사회가 인공임신중절 시술을 한 의료기관 3곳을 고발했을 때에도 사무장이 구속 기소된 한 곳을 제외하고 각각 벌금 200만원에 약식기소, 무혐의 처리를 받았을 뿐이다.

In February, a pro-life doctor’s association filed suits against 3 clinics where abortions were being performed, but in all but one the managers simply to had to pay fines of 2 million won each in out of court settlements.

또 한 지난 5월에는 부산지방법원에서 임신 7주의 여성에게 인공임신중절을 시술한 혐의로 기소된 의사에 대해서도 선고유예판결을 내렸다. 당시 재판관은 “낙태에 대한 처벌과 관련해 공권력의 처벌의지가 상대적으로 미약했던”사실에 비춰 “의사에 대한 처벌은 형평성에 어긋난다”고 선고유예의 이유를 밝혔다.

In May, at Busan District Court, a doctor who was suspected of performing an abortion on a woman who was 7 weeks pregnant received a suspended sentence. In that case, the judge said in his or her judgment that “the government’s will for punishing abortion-related crimes is relatively weak”, and that the reason for the suspended sentence in that case was that “the [prescribed] punishment ran counter to notions of social equity”.

의사에게 징역형을 선고한 울산지방법원의 김정민 재판관이 “태아의 생명은 사람의 생명과 마찬가지로 형법이 보호하고자 하는 매우 중요한 법익”이라며 “형법의 비추에 피고인의 범행은 그 죄질이 가볍다고 볼 수 없”다고 선고 이유를 밝힌 것과 대조적이다.

In complete contrast, Kim Jeong-min, the judge who gave the jail sentence to the manager in Ulsan, said the reason was that “a fetus’s life is exactly the same a person’s life, and deserves the full benefit and protection of the law”, and hence “the defendant’s crime could not be punished lightly”.

( Source )

“징역형 선고, 중절수술 위축시킬 것”

“With Sentences, the Number of Abortions Will Go Down”

특히 9월 울산지방법원의 판결은 임신 10주의 ‘초기낙태’와 ‘10대여성의 낙태’에 대해 징역형을 선고한 것이어서 판결이 던진 파장이 심상치 않다. ‘의학적으로 시술이 안전한’ 12주 미만의 인공임신중절은 이미 많은 국가에서 합법화되어 있으며, 10대 임신의 경우에도 현실적으로 양육의 어려움이 있어 사실상 임신중절 허용사유로 용인되어 왔기 때문이다.

In particular, the September case in Ulsan has generated a lot of controversy because the doctor’s sentence was for an abortion performed on a teenage girl who was 10 weeks pregnant. After all, not only is abortion in the first trimester completely safe and legal in many countries, but the general consensus is that such young girls have special difficulties in raising a child.

이 판결에 대해 <임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크>는 29일 “여성의 결정권을 원천적으로 부정하는” 판결이라며 규탄성명을 내고, 항소심에 적극 대응할 것을 천명하고 나섰다. 임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크는 인공임신중절을 범죄화하는 움직임에 대응하기 위해 결성된 단체로서, 여성·노동·진보 단체들과 진보신당, 민주노동당이 함께 참여하고 있다.

< 임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크>는 잇따른 “징역형 선고가 선례가 돼 올해 2~3월처럼 낙태 수술이 위축돼 낙태 수술비가 치솟고, 낙태를 필요로 하는 여성들이 심각한 어려움에 처하게 될 것”이라고 심각한 우려를 표했다.

On the 29th of September, the NPBDR denounced that judgment as “fundamentally denying women’s rights” and that the group would actively appeal it. The NPBDR is an organization that was established to fight against the criminalization of abortion in conjunction with women’s groups, worker’s groups, progressive groups and the New Progressive and Democratic Labor Party. In addition, the NPBDR expressed serious worry about the “continuing cases of sentencing for abortions, which like those cases in February and March set precedents, and were accompanied by decreases in the numbers of abortions and a sudden rise in their expenses, which became a serious concern for women seeking abortions.”

( Source )

실제로 올해 2월 프로라이프 의사회의 산부인과 고발 후, 산부인과의 임신중절 시술 기피로 인해 고통을 호소하는 상담전화가 여성단체에 빗발쳤다. 시술비용이 치솟았고, 비싼 수술비와 처벌에 대한 두려움 때문에 ‘원정낙태’를 알아보는 여성들까지 나타났었다.

After a pro-life doctor’s group filed suit against gynecologists in February, the reality was that they started avoiding providing abortion services, leading to a torrent of pleads for help from women to women’s groups’ hotlines. Because of the sudden increase in their expenses, and the fear of being punished, many women are now considering getting abortions overseas.

‘임신중절 허용’ 법 개정 움직임에 역행

Such Judgments Work Against Abortion Law Reform

< 임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크>는 특히 “여성운동이 여성의 요청에 의한 낙태를 허용하라는 목소리를 높이고 있고, 한나라당 홍일표 의원, 산부인과의사회, 법무부 형사법개정특별심의위원회 등도 제한적이나마 낙태를 허용하는 방향의 법 개정을 주장”하고 있는 상황에서 이런 판결이 나온 것에 대해 깊은 유감을 나타냈다.

The NPBDR, deeply saddened by the above cases, says “women’s movements and women in general are raising their voices high in their demands for legalizing abortion, and have the support of National Assemblyman Hong Il-pyeo of the ruling Grand National Party, gynecologists’ groups, and the Special Committee for the Reform of Criminal Law under the Ministry of Justice, and so on, that, although they only have limited political power, are also insisting on the legalization of abortion.”

“낙태가 불법화된 나라들이 합법화된 나라들보다 낙태율이 오히려 더 높”은 것에서도 드러나듯, “처벌이 결코 낙태를 줄일 수 없다”는 사실에 대해 이미 국제사회뿐만 아니라 우리나라에서도 공감대가 확산되고 있는 시점에서 시대착오적인 판결이라는 것이다. 현재 국제사회에서는 유엔 여성차별철폐협약(CEDAW)에 근거해 인공임신중절한 여성을 처벌하는 ‘낙태죄’ 폐지를 각국에 권고하고 있다.

Also, “compared to countries where abortion is legal, in fact abortion rates are higher in countries that have criminalized it,” and this means that “criminalizing abortions can never bring abortion rates down,” a fact that at this point in time not just international society, but Koreans also agree on, and so find the above judgments an anachronism. Presently, on the basis of the Convention on the U.N. Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), international society is recommending each country to abolish laws defining abortion as a crime and not punishing women who have abortions. (source, above)

< 임신․출산 결정권을 위한 네트워크>는 “출산은 여성의 삶 전체에 지대한 영향”을 미치고 “출산에 뒤따르는 책임을 감당할 당사자도 여성”이라는 점을 환기시키며 “자신의 삶에 대해 신중하게 고민하고 낙태를 결정한 여성을 범죄자 취급해서는 안 된다”고 못 박았다. 또한 앞으로 있을 항소심에 대한 구체적 대응을 준비 중에 있다고 덧붙였다.

Finally, the NPBDR wants to remind everyone that “giving birth is the single most influential thing in a woman’s whole life,” and is accompanied by a great deal of anxiety about how and if she will be able to cope with her new role as a mother. The group firmly insisted that “accordingly women who have agonized over this and come to the final decision to have an abortion should not be treated like criminals,” and added that they were making strenuous efforts to prepare to fight for their appeal against the Suwon judgment (end).

And on that note, apologies for not finding any information about the woman fined for simply planning an abortion, as mentioned in the earlier post, and I’ll keep looking. But in the meantime, I was very happy to read about the palpable resistance to Lee Myung-bak’s anti-abortion drive that is already emerging!

Share


Filed under: Abortion, Childbirth, Korean Families, Korean Feminism, Korean Sexuality, Pregnancy, Women's Groups Tagged: Abortion, 낙태, 임신출산결정권을위한네트워크
  

 

Say it Ain’t So!

Yesterday I’m scrolling through my rss reader when I come across a post by good ole Mr. Dubs. It seems  he’s decided to call it quits on the k-blogging scene because of some threats he received from alleged Korean netizens looking to rid the peninsula of  ESL teachers who stray from the pack of conformity. In other words, Mr Dubs said some shit they didn’t like on his blog, An Idiots Tale, and now they’ve threatened to rat him out to his employer. Because I can no longer link to the specific post here’s some exerts from the comments he recieved:

I am the member from an organization of concerned Korean to clean up ESL industry…

…I think you should be very careful from now, as some member want to find the school where you work to tell about your blog…

You have wife and children, you should respect. You know about Korea right? You know it is danger to use internet in irresponsible way. If many Korean see this blog, it can be a danger for your future and family…

At first the old man shrugged the off the threats and kept doing his thing, but now after possibly receiving more threats, he’s decided to pull the plug:

The internet is anonymous. So the guy who made this evil promise might actually be a white dude pretending he’s a netzien.

Who knows?

If he is Korean, his anger is ironic.

I have the most pro-Korean blog on the peninsula.

I enjoy living on the peninsula. Plus I’ve always had a healthy affection for Her people.

Shit! I married a member of the tribe.

I think my twisted love-affair with the ROK comes through strongly in my blog.

But let’s face facts. Netziens are crazy bullies who have literally driven people to suicide.

Furthermore, I have a family. So I can’t take these threats lightly.

It would be different if I had the talent of Ernest Hemingway. Then I would have to continue writing for the good of mankind.

But I don’t possess that type of skill. I’m just an entertaining hack killing time between classes.

I have no right to put The Dragon Lady and The Children of the Rice in jeopardy over a stupid website.

Some of you might call me a pussy. And maybe I am.

But there’s no way in fucking hell that I want to face the ire of the Korean internet community. They’ll rip poor old Mr. Wonderful a new asshole.

I’m scared. Plain and simple.

Nobody is more saddened by this sorry state of affairs than me.

However, all things must come to an end.

And I’m afraid it’s time to kill An Idiot’s Tale for the well-being of my family.

I’m not 100 percent certain. But I don’t see any other option.

This isn’ the first time something l this has happened in Korea. So Why do I bring this up now?

For starters, as a journalist I’m always saddened when a fellow scribe gets pushed around to the point where it becomes dangerous to keep writing. Angry comments are one thing , but threatening a man’s family is crossing the line.

Secondly, I’d like to point out that while Mr. Dubs talked a ton of shit  (garnering friends and enemies alike) I would never say that he had an “anti-Korean” blog. There’s far worse shit being written by Korean haters who have been here for years. Hell, just drop by Daves ESL Cafe and read some of the malicious statements being slung around the forums comprised of nothing but grumpy expats. It’s downright sickening. Sure Mr. Dubs picked fights with other expat bloggers but he kept things cheeky in regards to Korean affairs–correct me if I’m wrong.

Lastly, this is a good time to give a heads up to newbie or would be bloggers in the R.O.K. Keep your scribblings tight my friends. I’m not encouraging you to sensor you shit by any means–fuck that–but know that if you post even slightly controversial material, and someone gets a hold of it at your job, there could be consequences. Again, If you got something to say, don’t be a punk, say it and own it, but know that there’s risks involved. This is not a game for the faint or weary people.

I can’t speak for Hagwon teachers, but if you’re teaching for EPIK, there’s a specific clause in your contract that prohibits you from making defamatory statements about your school or the people in it. I’d hate to think that this could include a sarcastic or cynical anecdote about a crazy day at work, but this is Korea, you never know. I recently was faced with a dilemma where someone at my school read my blog and took offense. I was able to successfully defend my writing, but it could have easily gone the the other way. And I’m not trying to scare any potential bloggers out of posting  their critical thoughts on life in Korea. A great number of blogs out there are as harmless as they come. I only mean to inform those bloggers who choose to walk the line. As a friend of mine said recently, Freedom of Speech is one thing, but Korean sensitivity is something totally different.

As for Mr. Dubs, if you’re truly calling it a wrap, you will be missed homie. I didn’t always agree with your point of view, but I did appreciate the laughs and your anecdotes about life on the rice paddy. Some may call you a pussy for kicking the blog to the curb, but as far as I’m concerned there’s nothing wrong for wanting to do right by your family. The internet is a hellish place and there’s no telling what these freaks might do. I fear for my dreads even now, and my shitty blog garners no where near the amount of traffic yours did. Anyways take care of yourself old man, and we’ll be waiting for your return, even if it’s only to shoot the shit.

Ciao, and Blian Golden Balls to you as well.

Kimchi Dreadlocks

P.S. To the stupid fuckers who sent the threats, Korean or otherwise, kindly do me a favor and fuck off. You’ll never get rid of us all.


Breeze Burns, Nampo Dong

The popular burger joint Breeze Burns has just opened a branch in Nampo-dong, just down the street from the new Lotte Department store.

Suddenly, Nampo-dong has a bunch of great western food options. Not only do we have Breeze Burns now, but in the new Lotte Department store there is also a Quiznos, Auntie Annie's Pretzels and Irish Potato (Yes, Irish Potato).

Still no mexican food though. 

Dance, kids, dance.

[Flash 10 is required to watch video.]

Dance, kids, dance.

Pages

Subscribe to Koreabridge MegaBlog Feed