Like everywhere else, Korea has a long tradition of celebrities endorsing government campaigns.

Unlike everywhere else, a “huge proportion of Korean ads depend on famous people,” says Bruce Haines, head of Korea’s largest ad agency Cheil Worldwide, a tendency which in its crudest form degenerates Korean advertising into merely “beautiful people holding a bottle.” In turn, that leads to a scramble for and subsequent overexposure of whichever Korean stars are most popular at that moment, regardless of their inappropriateness for the product(s).

Government campaigns are no different, to my mind the most notorious case still being the National Election Commission’s (중앙선거관리위원회) choice of The Wondergirls (원더걸스) to encourage people to vote in local elections in April 2008. Needless to say, I can’t think of anyone more inappropriate than teenagers (two of whom were only 15), and their choice of outfits simply beggars belief:

But again, no different to what they wore in commercials at the time. Which is precisely my point: regardless of their merits, major trends in advertising are bound to be reflected in government campaigns sooner or later.

And as long term readers of this blog will be well aware, one trend is encouraging consumers to associate certain foods and drinks with certain desired body shapes. While it is hardly unique to Korea, it is done to excess here.

Is it any wonder then, that with the decline of the domestic rice industy, and concerns food security as a whole, that the government would do the same when promoting the consumption of domestic foods and drinks?

Last year for instance, I gave the example of how the Korean rice wine Makgeolli (막걸리) was being marketed to women on the basis that it is supposedly good for one’s skin. Now, I’ve found two more examples by the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (농림수산식품부; MIFAFF), using the new group 4Minute (포미닛) and the Olympic medalist Park Tae-hwan (박태환) respectively:

To be clear, I am not saying that either are inappropriate choices. Actually I think they’re rather good: both are very popular, and it turns out that 4minutes’ egg song is a variation of their recent hit “Hot issue” too. I also fully concede that the connections between consumption of the product and obtaining an attractive body are fleeting (4minute) or merely implied (Park Tae-hwan) at best.

But still, they’re there. And given the long-term problems with Korean agriculture as identified above, then I hereby predict that we’re going to be seeing many more public campaigns like these in 2010. In particular, the links made between the products being advertised and obtaining an “S-line” and so on are going to be made more explicit.

Sound like an exaggeration? Well, recall how quickly commercial incentives have transformed decades-old standards for soju advertisements: just three years ago, they overwhelmingly offered virginal images of women, whereas now it’s rather difficult to find ones that don’t present them as eminently sexually available. Moreover, in an effort to appeal more to women, soju companies too are encouraging them to associate new lower-strength brands with maintaining a good body, however implausibly.

But perhaps an even more appropriate example is soy milk. If you’ll bear with me, being allergic to milk means that I follow developments in the soy milk industry here pretty closely, and Starbucks Korea’s belated decision to add soy to its menu in 2005 had a huge impact on my quality of life here! Not unlike the drinks themselves though (anybody know where I can find these flavored ones?) – or, indeed, government campaigns – soy milk commercials tend to be rather bland, so I certainly sat up and took notice when I first saw this one a few days ago:

Soy milk companies too then, seem to be adopting the tactics of their more popular counterparts now. Lest I appear overly critical though, consider the scene 0:03 from 0:06 where 17 year-old Kim Hyun-ah’s says “[S]라인을 유지하려면 어쩔 수 없어,” or “If you want to maintain your S-line, you have no choice but to [drink] this.” Despite my constant criticisms of that sort of thing, and my earnest desire that my daughters don’t grow up to repeat it, I have to admit that I can’t help but find her expression and tone of voice, well, extremely cute…

Yes, I know: very hypocritical of me, and I await your counsel. But on a final, more serious note, consider Garaetteok Day (가래떡데이), MIFAFF’s scheme since 2006 to get people to eat stick-shaped rice cakes instead of Pepero chocolate sticks on November 11 each year. Promoted mostly as a romantic event for couples, as are most imported and/or artificially created holidays (Christmas Day, for instance, is the date the most condoms are sold in Korea), is it really too much of a jump to imagine that concerns about one’s appearances will be added to that too? Watch this space!

Update: An alternative way of exploiting Koreans’ associations with November 11 (source):

(For all posts in the Korean Sociological Images series, see here)

"I told you a hundred times that 'how to say' is much more important than 'what to say,'" said Kim Byeong-cheol, the instructor and also director of the hagwon, furiously writing "30 percent" and "60 percent" beside "how to say" and "what to say," which he had previously scribbled on the white board.

Students hurriedly nodded and highlighted the phrases in their textbooks.

A volume of teaching materials which would amaze most people who had never imagined that dating skills could be taught in such an academic way, were used in the class.

One kind was video clips of actual blind date situations. In the video, a guy was struggling to make a conversation with the beautiful girl sitting in front of him. After the viewing, the class tried to figure out what the guy had done wrong.

"I think his baseball cap was an error. His glasses, too. He should've worn contact lenses," said a student.

"He's leaning towards the girl too much. He looks too desperate. It is certainly not the ideal posture of a proud male," said another.

"Is he wearing short sleeves or did he roll up his sleeves? I heard it is better for men to hide as much flesh as possible and for women to reveal as much as possible on a first date," said the last one.

"What you guys said were all correct. I mean, what's with the baseball cap? A fedora could have been better. We have interviewed the girl, so let's hear her impressions of the guy," the instructor said, clicking another video clip.

The class continued for two and a half hours, looking at video clips, discussing them and going over the textbook with the instructor.

What disturbs me is the notion of one-method-fits-all teaching. If having the right 'look' means dressing the same preppy / pretty way, count me out. There's a 'correct' way to talk to a woman? Give me a break. The thought that sitting in a classroom and taking notes will somehow help me pick up women? Come on. While I don't advocate the type of 'pick-up school' promulgated by Neil Strauss' "The Game", it is at least more experiential in its nature. Learning to fly without a safety net forces you - yes, forces you - to get out there and do it. Going to a class that either lets you cheat or get by with simulated situations can't possibly prepare you for reality. Only reality and time can do that - until you get both from a experienced teacher, you're shortchanging yourself and being overcharged at the same time.

Beyond collecting money and providing something claiming to be education, the one thing these hagwon seem to promote is Their Method - calculated, crafted, and honed by supposed years of experience in the field. Only we have the inside edge on the subject at hand, the best teachers, and the hyperbole goes on. To be fair, I have the firm belief that anyone can learn given the interest and desire to learn - and some hagwon may be conducive to such endeavors. That some schools will teach their One Method to Fit All People seems a slap in the face to independent thought, personal freedom, or different approaches.

Beyond the dating hagwon mentioned in the story, there's also the medical schools. Supposedly for medical school graduates, a few quotes from the story gave me pause:

"Also, there is a big gap between medical classes given in universities and the actual medical scene but the professors can't teach the students one by one how to fill the gap. It is up to the students. Unfortunately, most medical students these days are used to hagwon and private lessons, so they don't know what to do unless they are taught. At the hagwon, we teach experience rather than medical knowledge," he said.

Medipreview started in 2003 when Gwon gave an emergency room lecture to 40 public health doctors.

"Because they just graduated from medical school, they didn't know even the most basic things like how to read X-rays or what kind of medicine to prescribe. They needed help," Gwon said.

What the heck are you learning in medical school?