Brand Names and Status Games

One of the first observations my mother made of Korean people when she visited me a few weeks ago was that everyone wore such nice shoes, especially the women, but the men also.  A short time later she also noted that many of them had designer handbags, watches, and clothes. 

I suspect the reality of Korea was nothing like what she might have pictured when I first told her I was planning to work there.  I am guessing she would have had visions of Thailand or Vietnam, places where you can see development but also has its lion's share of poverty.

It does appear that everybody has money and is displaying this to everyone else.  It can be difficult to pick out the wealthy from the relatively poor.  It is almost like an arms race but it's not about who has the strongest weapons it's about who has the best brands and most expensive gear.

Status really matters in this part of the world, the Joseon Dynasty was the longest running Confucian empire and ideals of status within society run very deep in this line of thought.  High status used to be based on bloodlines, scholarly accomplishment, battlefield triumphs, or good business acumen, but these days it is increasingly displayed by what people wear and own.

As well as the status element to their culture, Korea also is a group centred culture, which makes fitting in and being accepted by your peers and others even more important than it is in Western culture.  This means if one person has brand name shoes or a designer watch everyone else tends to follow.

You can see the fall-out from all of this by just walking the streets but things become even worse when you are transported into a school.  There seem to be a few must-haves for my high school students; colourful brand name trainers, North Face jackets, and - something I have only recently noticed - big divers-like watches.

If I sound a little out of my depth here in talking about what is fashionable, you would not be wrong.  I have always distanced myself from all this brand name nonsense.  It has always looked like a perfect waste of money to me and it has a divisive and shallowing effect on society generally.

This is how the war of status is played out in the classrooms and streets of Korea with trinkets bought from some of the most over-priced and pretentious department stores you will ever see.  No wonder these places can afford to employ about 2 or 3 members of staff for every section and brand they sell.

I just do not know how Korean people afford all these things.  They work some of the longest hours in the world then flitter all their cash on over-hyped garbage that they simply don't need and won't make them happier.  It is all simply to make themselves either be as good as or better than the next person.  You don't have to be a philosopher to realise this is not a great recipe for living the good life.

So are we in the West so much more enlightened?  Well, when it comes to brand names maybe we do have more people who show disdain for them and because of our culture it may be a little more acceptable to not go along with the crowd.  Many people do, however, still have an obsession with it, indeed we are the originators of it and it is further fuelled by the celebrity obsessed masses.

It has to be said, though, that our status games are fought on a battlefield with slightly different rules.

My country has spawned the slightly cringe-worthy phrase 'Cool Britannia' and I think this sums things up quite nicely, essentially it's saying we are not powerful anymore, but we are at least trendier than everywhere else.  In the UK status is still important for people - it always will be in a social primate species - but it is not necessarily possessions that show-off someone's status it is their levels of confidence, arrogance, and sometimes their disdain for others, in short, how 'cool' they are.

Being 'cool' is how you are socially accepted and how you climb up the tree of status, exactly like the brand name obsession of Korea.  Now, brand names can aid in this, but - conversely to Korea - one biggest aspects is being individual, being crazy, standing out in a crowd or rebelling against 'the system', whatever that is.

While expressing your individuality might seem like a good idea that would breed a healthy unrepressed sort of society, actually the opposite is true.  There will always be the true characters that are genuinely different and that are natural and comfortable with being set apart from everybody else, but the fact is that most people are not like this at all, they only act this way to make others believe that they are.

'Statistics show that the average person doesn't think they are very average at all.'  I have always liked this quote because it really is so true.  This is also a little depressing for people from my culture who want to be different, wild, or crazy, because most just aren't.  So in the 99% of people you see that are acting in a confident, outlandish, or in a maverick kind of manner, most of them are doing just that, acting, and it is not for the benefit of letting their personality run free, it is for everyone else so they can climb that status ladder.  These people are on a par with those that are carrying the Prada bags, Gucci watches, and North Face jackets.

Coming back to Korea, it is not just us Brits that have this disease it has afflicted most of the Western world.  When foreigners display 'the bulldozer effect' - this being a lack of sensitivity in handling touchy cultural situations - it is often directly related to looking good.  One classic way of looking 'cool' is not caring about convention and doing things your way.  Well, if people do that here, many Koreans will be offended, but then again they don't care, right?  Offence is sometimes necessary, especially when there is injustice involved, but this is rarely the motivation behind most issues in Korea involving offence caused by foreigners.

English teachers living in South Korea provide an interesting experiment in status games because almost everyone is in the same boat; they have the same job, the same kind of apartment, and are mostly as unaware as each other of the culture in which they reside. 

Now don't take this the wrong way but I always thought there was just something a little strange about many of the foreigners that come to Korea, some do not appear to be that genuine.  Firstly, I should say that this does not apply to everyone I have met, but still a fair few fit into this bracket.  This could be because they are in a foreign situation with no friends they have known for a long time, so they try too hard to impress.  It could also be exactly because of the equality in jobs and lifestyles that they have to stand out somehow.

Some people who come to Korea to work have problems that are not of their own making as it is always a possibility (in any country) to meet unscrupulous people, but many create their own problems and this has a lot to do with the attitude they display in trying to elevate their status.  Whatever happened to acting humble in a unfamiliar place? 

Some people I have met in Korea have stepped off the plane in Incheon and approached each situation as bold as brass with a confidence and dare I say an arrogance which I could see would upset people, not only here but in any country.  It is like stepping onto a football field having never played before and expecting to be on the same level as professionals.  Everyone deserves respect but when the Western bulldozer comes through it must be hard for some Korean people to show it sometimes.


If you see yourself as king of the jungle, you might have a tough time in Korea

Finally, if anyone is having problems out there, you should know that status is so important here.  If you accept the position of lower status and swallow your pride it can enable an escape from a variety of sticky situations.  Transcend the brand names and status games in any culture and life usually tastes much sweeter, perhaps even more so in Korea.





Comments

Re: Brand Names and Status Games

I have no idea how many times I've heard foreigners generalize against the entire population of foreigners teaching in Korea. I've lost count.

Depending on how long you stay here, perhaps there is a point at which we all become a little self-loathing. We are, afterall, a minority and this is something we are constantly aware of. 

The problem of the situation is that we know we can be represented by the actions of the few. Many Koreans haven't had enough exposure to foreign cultures and people to learn how to NOT generalize a group of people by the actions of a few. Now to be clear, we all know Koreans who have travelled and have become more open minded. I mean to aim this comment at the average Korean who has little exposure. 

However, we do have the exposure and experience. You meet a few D-bags or even more than a handful of D-bags and now its an epidemic. Sure, you stated "this does not apply to everyone I have met" which was a nice save, but clearly you go on to discuss the nature of people coming to teach in Korea, which is itself a generalization.

I knew my fair share of ingenuine, arrogant people back in Canada, and I don't think the statistics have altered that much.

My theory? We are all interacting with strangers far much more than we used to. Back home we had our comfortable social circles and we avoided interactions with strangers, maybe not pathologically, but definitely more than in Korea. We have to interact with strangers here or go insane from boredom. We are meeting people from different countries, backgrounds, cultures and I think we need to remember that we should remember this before we start judging the entire population of foreigners in Korea. I think we already get a fair share of that from the domestic populace. 

The funny thing about foreigners referring to foreigners as a distinct group is that we are foreign to each other. Canadians, Americans, Britains, South Africans, Australizans, New Zealanders, Irish, etc. etc. Obviously we might seem arrogant to each other.

We are all "foreign" in relation to Korea, sure, we all share that characteristic, we aren't Korean. I just want to see and hear less foreigner bashing from foreigners. 

Do I completely disagree with you? No, not at all. I especially liked the section on brand labels. Now that has DEFINITELY become an epidemic in Korea. It is interesting, culturally, how western cultures tend to avoid "cloning" each other (look around at the Abercombie and Fitch, that disgusting  brown Louis Vitton bag I see everywhere) whereas in Korea, seeing a mass group of people wearing these items actually REINFORCES desire for them. Interesting.

 

 

 

Re: Brand Names and Status Games

Thank you for a thoughtful response. I would agree with most of what you said, but I would like to address the accusation of over-generalising that you levelled against me. The comment that I made "this does not apply to everyone I have met", was more than just a save it was an honest and important save. Of course I am not lumping in every foreigner that comes to Korea into the same bracket. You rightly pointed out that there are good and bad people back home of about equal number, but that was missing the point (and you can still be nice but not genuine). My point was that the games of trying to attain higher status are generally the same for many foreigners coming from an array of countries to Korea as they are in my country the UK (at least that is my observation, I could be wrong). Now this is a generalisation, but it is impossible to observe patterns of behaviour in groups of people without making some generalised conclusions, many people will obviously fall outside of a pattern observed and therefore one should never act in a discriminatory manner towards them. Scientists engage in these kind of conclusions from the results of their data all the time, think of a scatter-graph. Would they be wrong to draw any conclusions from a graph with a general corrolation but with many anomalies? They would have to be cautious but it doesn't mean they shouldn't do it. That is all I tried to do in the article. What I will accept is that perhaps your conclusion from observations might be better than mine (in that we are interacting with more strangers than normal, hence the slightly odd feeling) or that they maybe compatible. Finally, even if a minority of people within a culture behave in a certain way, some judgments can be made if that minority occurs in greater numbers than that of another culture. Take for example the problem that I mentioned of foreigner arrogance when arriving in Korea. I think it occurs in greater numbers than Koreans acting arrogant when they come to our countries, but there is a pattern of Koreans acting this way in places like the Philippines when they go there on vacation. The status of people's own countries, in my opinion, can lead to the perceived perception of their own status while in another country. This is the possible reason for my conclusions in the article.